Ashes to Ashes
After witnessing the greatest ever series in 2005, what a huge disappointment this Ashes series has been. England have lost the urn, are 4-0 down, and it seems inevitable they will suffer the first 5-0 defeat since 1920-21.
This is especially disappointing given that this is not the worst England team to have toured Australia in recent years, not by a long chalk. They re-established themselves as the no 2 team in the world with a series win over Pakistan in the summer. And well as they have played, the Australians are clearly past their best. Damien Martyn retired during the series, Warne and McGrath will do the same when it is over, and several others may follow.
Where then, has it gone so wrong?
First off, I think, was the appointment of Andrew Flintoff as captain. Make no mistake; I am a huge fan of his, as are most lovers of cricket. But however much he says he wants the job, wanting a job and being the best man for it are two entirely different things.
For a start, he came into the series well short of match fitness, and lacking in form. A few one-day games in India and the warm-up games were never going to be sufficient for him to prove otherwise. In any case, the role of captaincy has clearly proven too much in addition to expecting him to be a front-line bowler and no 6 batsman. His body language betrays this, and it is sad to see such a talismanic figure reduced to a shadow of his normal affable and enthusiastic self.
Andrew Strauss, on the other hand, captained the side with aplomb during the summer, leading England to a 3-0 victory over Pakistan, and in the process his batting was at its best. I am a great believer in the old adage "If it ain't broke don't fix it" and he is the obvious long-term successor to Vaughan, and so he should have been continued to be groomed for the role.
The next serious mistake England made was leaving out Panesar in favour of Giles. Like most pundits, I was apoplectic when I found out. Panesar was England's best bowler in the summer - how could they leave him out?? And stating that no 8 has to score runs sends only one message to the opposition - we don't think our batsmen can score enough runs to win a test match. As expected this mistake was rectified but by then England were 2-0 down and it was too late.
The other selection mistakes England made were Jones for Read and Anderson for Mahmood. Read kept immaculately in the summer, averaged 42 with the bat, and deserved a longer run in the side. The desire to keep as many of the players who won the Ashes in 2005 has proven costly - this England side have moved on since then. Mahmood may only have proven marginally more successful than Anderson but he does have real pace - and he can bat. Clearly he is the better long-term prospect.
But what is most disappointing about this series is the way some of the established players have failed to produce the goods, and the manner in which they have been beaten. Being 4-0 down would be no disgrace had the matches been close and hard-fought, but England increasingly have the look of a team who have lost heart.
Evidence of this was their second innings in the fourth test. 200-odd runs behind but 10 wickets in hand is still not an impossible position from which to win a test match. What it required was a couple of big hundreds, and for one player to play an Atherton-esque innings. The biggest problem England have had is that no one has spent enough time at the crease. None of their batsmen has scored the kind of runs required in this series, and in the case of Kevin Pietersen - who made the move to the correct place at no 4 in the order only after 3 1/2 tests - this has been especially disappointing.
Given that Vaughan's return to the team is imminent and one of the top 5 will have to make way, this is astonishing - surely someone would be making a statement to say "I'm damned if I'm going to lose my place"?
KP is clearly interested in the celebrity lifestyle and has stated that his aim is to make as much money as possible playing cricket. That is all well and good, but even the most talented of us have to do our jobs damn well to do that. As the one batsmen feared by Australia, he has failed to do that.
As I have stated, there is no shortage of talent in this England team, which makes the score line doubly disappointing. Perhaps the best example of this is Steve Harmison. At his best, Harmison is nothing short of awesome. Of course, no one expects him to get a five-fer in every test, but in the last two years he has blown cold more than hot and the word is that one of the reasons Flintoff was appointed captain was to get the best out of his mate.
Rest assured that Glenn McGrath doesn't need his best mate to be captain to perform at his best. All he needs is to be handed his baggy green cap.
That is the essential difference between these two teams - the pride in playing for their country, and the belief they can win no matter the situation. Take nothing away from the Australians - they have demonstrated what it takes to be true champions. Many people, such as myself, thought this could be one series too many for several of them, but they have proved us all wrong, and then some.
Enjoy watching this Australian team perform in the last test - it will be the last time some members of the best team of all time play together.
Copyright © Jonathan Weedon, December 2006
This is especially disappointing given that this is not the worst England team to have toured Australia in recent years, not by a long chalk. They re-established themselves as the no 2 team in the world with a series win over Pakistan in the summer. And well as they have played, the Australians are clearly past their best. Damien Martyn retired during the series, Warne and McGrath will do the same when it is over, and several others may follow.
Where then, has it gone so wrong?
First off, I think, was the appointment of Andrew Flintoff as captain. Make no mistake; I am a huge fan of his, as are most lovers of cricket. But however much he says he wants the job, wanting a job and being the best man for it are two entirely different things.
For a start, he came into the series well short of match fitness, and lacking in form. A few one-day games in India and the warm-up games were never going to be sufficient for him to prove otherwise. In any case, the role of captaincy has clearly proven too much in addition to expecting him to be a front-line bowler and no 6 batsman. His body language betrays this, and it is sad to see such a talismanic figure reduced to a shadow of his normal affable and enthusiastic self.
Andrew Strauss, on the other hand, captained the side with aplomb during the summer, leading England to a 3-0 victory over Pakistan, and in the process his batting was at its best. I am a great believer in the old adage "If it ain't broke don't fix it" and he is the obvious long-term successor to Vaughan, and so he should have been continued to be groomed for the role.
The next serious mistake England made was leaving out Panesar in favour of Giles. Like most pundits, I was apoplectic when I found out. Panesar was England's best bowler in the summer - how could they leave him out?? And stating that no 8 has to score runs sends only one message to the opposition - we don't think our batsmen can score enough runs to win a test match. As expected this mistake was rectified but by then England were 2-0 down and it was too late.
The other selection mistakes England made were Jones for Read and Anderson for Mahmood. Read kept immaculately in the summer, averaged 42 with the bat, and deserved a longer run in the side. The desire to keep as many of the players who won the Ashes in 2005 has proven costly - this England side have moved on since then. Mahmood may only have proven marginally more successful than Anderson but he does have real pace - and he can bat. Clearly he is the better long-term prospect.
But what is most disappointing about this series is the way some of the established players have failed to produce the goods, and the manner in which they have been beaten. Being 4-0 down would be no disgrace had the matches been close and hard-fought, but England increasingly have the look of a team who have lost heart.
Evidence of this was their second innings in the fourth test. 200-odd runs behind but 10 wickets in hand is still not an impossible position from which to win a test match. What it required was a couple of big hundreds, and for one player to play an Atherton-esque innings. The biggest problem England have had is that no one has spent enough time at the crease. None of their batsmen has scored the kind of runs required in this series, and in the case of Kevin Pietersen - who made the move to the correct place at no 4 in the order only after 3 1/2 tests - this has been especially disappointing.
Given that Vaughan's return to the team is imminent and one of the top 5 will have to make way, this is astonishing - surely someone would be making a statement to say "I'm damned if I'm going to lose my place"?
KP is clearly interested in the celebrity lifestyle and has stated that his aim is to make as much money as possible playing cricket. That is all well and good, but even the most talented of us have to do our jobs damn well to do that. As the one batsmen feared by Australia, he has failed to do that.
As I have stated, there is no shortage of talent in this England team, which makes the score line doubly disappointing. Perhaps the best example of this is Steve Harmison. At his best, Harmison is nothing short of awesome. Of course, no one expects him to get a five-fer in every test, but in the last two years he has blown cold more than hot and the word is that one of the reasons Flintoff was appointed captain was to get the best out of his mate.
Rest assured that Glenn McGrath doesn't need his best mate to be captain to perform at his best. All he needs is to be handed his baggy green cap.
That is the essential difference between these two teams - the pride in playing for their country, and the belief they can win no matter the situation. Take nothing away from the Australians - they have demonstrated what it takes to be true champions. Many people, such as myself, thought this could be one series too many for several of them, but they have proved us all wrong, and then some.
Enjoy watching this Australian team perform in the last test - it will be the last time some members of the best team of all time play together.
Copyright © Jonathan Weedon, December 2006
